-
Nov. 2, 2012, 04:59 PM
#1
-
Nov. 2, 2012, 05:03 PM
#2
It could be because some states dont aknowlge(sp) common law.
Friend of bar .ka
I can not type so get over yourselves who think everyone can. Some of us just can not. Typing is not a measure of IQ it is just another tool of communication.
-
Nov. 2, 2012, 05:08 PM
#3
Wouldn't same sex and opposite sex domestic partners be able to use the same form? The Affidavit doesn't, as you typed it, stipulate any gender.
Aisha, my heart from 03/06/1986 to 08/22/2008.
COTH's official mini-donk enabler.
-
Nov. 2, 2012, 05:12 PM
#4
Things may have changed in the past several years (used to be a Benefits Administrator) as far as IRS requirements for Member of Household coverage, but it used to be based on tax filing status (dependent/not a dependent) and status of an adult sharing the same household and at least 50% of the household's financial responsibility. The affadavit used by my company required notorized signing of shared financial responsibility, and document proving residence (such as a bill with the address and name of the other party). My roommate was my MOH for years.
-
Nov. 2, 2012, 05:17 PM
#5
Manual provided specifically sates opposite sex & common law partners are excluded.
Erniewalker: that sounds right to me, but see above ^
I haven't seen the actual Affadavit form - I'll try looking it up on the company intranet.
*friend of bar.ka*RIP all my lovely boys, gone too soon:
Steppin' Out 1988-2004
Hey Vern! 1982-2009
Cash's Bay Threat 1994-2009
-
Nov. 2, 2012, 05:28 PM
#6
The actual Affadavit form states DP applicants must be registered "where allowed by state or local law"
It goes on to say if no such registration is available both must:
*be of the same sex
*be jointly responsible for household expenses, or employee must support partner "partner is chiefly dependent upon"
*neither be married to anyone else, legally separated, or have any other partner
*not related by blood closer than permitted by state law
*in a committed relationship
*both at least 21yo
*have lived together for at least one year and "intend to do so indefintely"
I still don't see how these terms can exclude opposite sex partners fulfilling the same requirements and be legal.
Can someone 'splain?
*friend of bar.ka*RIP all my lovely boys, gone too soon:
Steppin' Out 1988-2004
Hey Vern! 1982-2009
Cash's Bay Threat 1994-2009
-
Nov. 2, 2012, 05:38 PM
#7
My company's DP policy states that if marriage is legal in the jurisdiction, then domestic partners must be married to qualify. Since opposite sex marriage is legal everywhere, that clause limits the DP coverage to same sex couples.
Similar Threads
-
By SGray in forum Off Topic Day!
Replies: 23
Last Post: Nov. 1, 2012, 10:10 AM
-
By KivaDiva in forum Off Topic Day!
Replies: 85
Last Post: May. 2, 2011, 03:38 PM
-
By MunchingonHay in forum Off Topic Day!
Replies: 58
Last Post: Apr. 22, 2011, 10:37 AM
-
By baldfaceboyz in forum Off Topic Day!
Replies: 1
Last Post: Jan. 2, 2011, 06:36 PM
-
By Perfect Pony in forum Off Topic Day!
Replies: 14
Last Post: Dec. 30, 2010, 06:25 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|