-
Sep. 6, 2012, 06:14 PM
#1
pro choice or anti choice
1 members found this post helpful.
-
Sep. 6, 2012, 06:23 PM
#2
What is the point of this latest pot-stirring thread, Coyoteco? Please explain yourself rather than simply linking to an interview posted on a conservative website.
Proud member of the Colbert Dressage Nation
4 members found this post helpful.
-
Sep. 6, 2012, 06:26 PM
#3
I agree. This does nothing positive to help the emotions of either side.
Our horses know our secrets; we braid our tears into their manes and whisper our hopes into their ears.
4 members found this post helpful.
-
Sep. 6, 2012, 06:37 PM
#4
Guys, guys!
I was totally pro-choice before I saw THIS link, posted by THIS well-reasoned COTHer.
This changes everything!
5 members found this post helpful.
-
Sep. 6, 2012, 06:45 PM
#5
Well, at least this poster doesn't run around bashing anyone that dares say anything that it doesn't like to hear.
I tried to ask "is enough enough?" a while back and got jumped on.
So, to be fair, if other posters could bring up their own obsessive political interest here, why not this one?
1 members found this post helpful.
-
Sep. 6, 2012, 07:04 PM
#6
 Originally Posted by meupatdoes
Guys, guys!
I was totally pro-choice before I saw THIS link, posted by THIS well-reasoned COTHer.
This changes everything! 
Well, because YOU changed your mind, I'm going to too. And I'm not even gonna read the link.
"Aye God, Woodrow..."
3 members found this post helpful.
-
Sep. 6, 2012, 07:11 PM
#7
Me too. My mind is changed just by thought transference. I've seen the light and changed my mind. Hallelujah!
“He who is cruel to animals becomes hard also in his dealings with men. We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals.”
― Immanuel Kant
2 members found this post helpful.
-
Sep. 6, 2012, 07:18 PM
#8
I actually didn't know my own mind, and on post #8 already forgot what we were talking about, but I agree with whatever you're all agreeing with!
Incidentally: http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/we...lican-platform
2 members found this post helpful.
-
Sep. 6, 2012, 07:27 PM
#9
As a Christian Conservative (old school) I say . . .IT'S NONE OF MY DAMN BUSINESS WHAT A WOMAN DOES TO HER BODY!! That is between her, her doctor and her God if she so believes.
When men get pregnant they get a vote on this until then shut up and sit down!
Thank you I feel better now, we need to Butt the Hell out!!!!!!!!
Lions and Tigers and Bears, oh my!!
6 members found this post helpful.
-
Sep. 6, 2012, 07:39 PM
#10
-
Sep. 6, 2012, 07:41 PM
#11
 Originally Posted by J-Lu
What is the point of this latest pot-stirring thread, Coyoteco? Please explain yourself rather than simply linking to an interview posted on a conservative website.
This is funny as is the one where Stewart's people do the exact same thing at the RNC, which is linked in this thread also.
-
Sep. 6, 2012, 07:42 PM
#12
This is the second time this poster has posted about this. I'm over it.
3 members found this post helpful.
-
Sep. 6, 2012, 07:43 PM
#13
 Originally Posted by Brookes
As a Christian Conservative (old school) I say . . .IT'S NONE OF MY DAMN BUSINESS WHAT A WOMAN DOES TO HER BODY!! That is between her, her doctor and her God if she so believes.
When men get pregnant they get a vote on this until then shut up and sit down!
Thank you I feel better now, we need to Butt the Hell out!!!!!!!!
This. Excellent post
I learned everything I know from a chestnut mare so don't even try me.
4 members found this post helpful.
-
Sep. 6, 2012, 09:42 PM
#14
So this is OT (haha) but why does Coyoteco publish who is on their ignore list in their sig line??
**Friend of bar.ka**
1 members found this post helpful.
-
Sep. 6, 2012, 09:44 PM
#15
OP, I think this horse has left the barn....... like, on page 2 of the initial thread, 5 days ago....
We couldn't all be cowboys, so some of us are clowns.
-
Sep. 6, 2012, 09:49 PM
#16
Oh, dani, you didn't know? I was TRYING to discuss something with Coyoteco, as was stolen virtue. Rather than argue her point, Coyoteco called stolen virtue "ignorant and stupid." I told her that was out of line and and rude as we are arguing facts even if we think she's nuts. I also reported her to the mods. and she was clearly given a warning. So, to "get back" at us, Coyoteco has me on ignore because I told her not to be rude, and stolen virtue on ignore (AND in sig line, I guess) because Coyoteco was extremely rude and did not apologize.
Yep. That's they way her thinking goes. After the rudeness I stopped responding to her and reading anything, but someone pointed put the sig line out to me.
And, stolen virtue and I are available for autographs if you'd like!
Last edited by Beentheredonethat; Sep. 6, 2012 at 10:13 PM.
2 members found this post helpful.
-
Sep. 6, 2012, 09:59 PM
#17
 Originally Posted by DeucesWild11
This is the second time this poster has posted about this. I'm over it.
Actually, it isn't. I posted a legitimate question about people's opinions of later term abortions because I wanted to know their opinions. As stated previously, I have not disclosed my opinion on the subject EVER here or on fb.
This, I though was really funny, as are the ones ont he RNC. Very different topic.
1 members found this post helpful.
-
Sep. 6, 2012, 10:01 PM
#18
 Originally Posted by dani0303
So this is OT (haha) but why does Coyoteco publish who is on their ignore list in their sig line??
To stop the sillines that wastes my time over the course of more than one thread and more than one ot day.
1 members found this post helpful.
-
Sep. 6, 2012, 10:06 PM
#19
 Originally Posted by FlashGordon
OP, I think this horse has left the barn....... like, on page 2 of the initial thread, 5 days ago....
Me, left the thread? I sort of did later on, though I read pretty much all of it. i wanted to find out what people really thought and Ilearned a lot. There was an issue with taking out what I thought were the givens, life of the mother, healthy baby, late term. Many of the posts talked of issues where the baby was dead or or compromised in some way. That wasn't part of my question really.
When it go into the conflict over the conduct of the respective groups, it became less interesting.
1 members found this post helpful.
-
Sep. 6, 2012, 10:14 PM
#20
Why wouldn't that be an issue? Lte term abortion is serious. If the the potential bchild is catastrophicallhy damaged it should matter
Similar Threads
-
By Auto Be A Storm in forum Eventing
Replies: 8
Last Post: Mar. 16, 2012, 03:14 PM
-
By CavalloManorInt in forum Dressage
Replies: 6
Last Post: Mar. 6, 2012, 02:17 PM
-
By Beentheredonethat in forum Off Topic Day!
Replies: 430
Last Post: Mar. 21, 2011, 01:36 PM
-
By enjoytheride in forum Eventing
Replies: 41
Last Post: Jul. 24, 2009, 07:23 PM
-
By Small Change in forum Hunter/Jumper
Replies: 15
Last Post: Apr. 1, 2009, 07:28 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|