MagazineNewsHorse SportsHorse CareCOTH StoreVoicesChronicle ConnectionMarketplaceDates & Results
 
June 21, 2010

This FEI Helmet Statement Is More Of A Whimper

Sara Lieser and Osh Kosh. Photo by Kat Netzler.

The Fédération Equestre Internationale Dressage Committee released a statement today recommending that dressage riders wear protective headgear while training and in the warm-up at shows. And, of course, if you want you can wear it when you canter down centerline as well.

Quite frankly, I think the Dressage Committee would have done better to release no statement at all.

They point to Courtney King Dye’s unfortunate head injury in March, which occurred while she was schooling at home, as the reason for their statement. So I could totally understand if helmet advocates used her accident as the impetus to try to pass a mandatory helmet rule.

On the other hand, Courtney isn’t the first person, or the last, to suffer a head injury that could’ve been prevented by wearing a helmet. Dressage riders have a long history of competing in top hats, so it doesn’t surprise me that many people are reluctant to give up that rite of passage, regardless of the dangers. After all, you can get injured stepping out your front door too.

I truly don’t have a strong opinion about whether helmets should be mandated or not. I respect that it’s a personal choice to wear one—it’s your head, not mine.

But I don’t see any point in a statement that says, “You should wear your helmet most of the time.”

Accidents can happen at any point—five judges sitting around the outside of the arena aren’t going to prevent a horse from bolting, spooking or tripping. In fact, the pressures of the show ring might make the unexpected more likely to happen.

I think many, many top riders would say they don their top hats because that’s what everyone else does, and that’s what’s expected in the ring, not because they object to wearing a helmet.

If the DC cares enough about safety to suggest riders wear their helmets while schooling at the show, then why not truly make a statement and encourage riders to wear their helmets in the competition ring as well?

What do you think? I'd love to hear from you in the comments.

 

 

 
2 years 47 weeks ago
lsprieser, I imagine the US
lsprieser, I imagine the US as more of a "guts and glory" place.  Not that litigation is far behind, but I think the helmet-free issue has a great deal to do with our self-image. I also think it... Read More
2 years 47 weeks ago
I think all of Catherine's
I think all of Catherine's points are valid, though stateside we have one major element to consider that our European friends (who have a very strong voice in the FEI) do not: far, far less of a... Read More

Comments

Catherine Haddad
2 years 47 weeks ago

weighing in....

Dear Sara,  This statement by the FEI DC is in the same spirit as many others--a preliminary announcement of intention to do something about a subject in the future...maybe.  Helmet usage has already been discussed in the IDRC and IDTC.  Members are chewing on it and recommendations from both clubs to the FEI DC will be made this year. 

The only question for most people is:  Should the use of helmets be mandatory in dressage or a recommended option? 

Try not to be too critical of the words used in these statements.  Most of them are written by people who speak English as a second language.  Therefore, their accuracy will always come into question. You could have a good laugh at many of the statements that cross my desk. 

Nobody would argue with a statement that says "You should wear your helmet all the time."  Everybody knows that.

Frankly, I believe the FEI DC will have a hard time getting approval for mandatory helmet use in dressage.  I do believe it should be encouraged as a favored safety option both in and out of the show ring.  Therefore, "should" over "must" for me.

And I do believe that this statement is better than none at all.  It at least indicates that the subject is up for discussion. 

Yours truly over apple struedel and coffee in Austria.... Catherine

 

lsprieser
2 years 47 weeks ago

I think all of Catherine's

I think all of Catherine's points are valid, though stateside we have one major element to consider that our European friends (who have a very strong voice in the FEI) do not: far, far less of a stigma against helmets. Working students at the barn I rode at in Germany teased one young woman for wearing a helmet, and I know many European sale barns who do not allow riders to show horses for sale while wearing a helmet, as they fear a buyer would think the horse dangerous.

Here, helmets are a requirement at many barns (including my own). At Lendon Gray's stable, where I trained while in college, riders who wished to ride without a helmet had to sign a special waiver. Perhaps it is because the US is a more litigious place?

Rider61
2 years 47 weeks ago

lsprieser, I imagine the US

lsprieser, I imagine the US as more of a "guts and glory" place.  Not that litigation is far behind, but I think the helmet-free issue has a great deal to do with our self-image.

I also think it's unfortunate.  The part of the picture that's rarely discussed is the endless attempts by the insurance industry to remove equestrians from their rolls.  Declaring statistically that riding is somewhere in the top 5 sports producing head trauma, and much of that requiring major medical intervention, insurers would like nothing more than to watch us battle down the possibility that helmets might become a requirement.

 

We would be doing everyone a service if we pushed the FEI to make helmets mandatory for competition.  That would set the example for new riders, and eventually the serious injury rate would decline.  Head injury is not just the purview of the injured.  Everyone around him--family, friends, health providers, totally unrelated insurance policy holders--becomes a part of the result.